I’ve read through your draft ‘letters to the editor,' and I see some good DRAFTS, but not one letter that can’t benefit from revision. So I thought I'd take the time here to give you some advice for your revisions. (I’m hoping that if I give you this advice to all of you NOW I won’t have to write it 25 times in the margins of your papers LATER ;-)
Here goes:
Organization:
You need to get a QUICK start. Don’t follow the school essay practice of starting with a generalization. Instead, take one of these approaches:
1) Establish your credibility in the very first phrase. Readers want answers to these questions: Who are you to be writing this letter? Why should I care what your opinion is? That’s why many good letters to the editor begin “As a UT student, I…” or “As a longtime country-music fan, I…”
2) Use the opening sentence to tell exactly what you are responding to—name the particular event or news article that prompted you to write. Be precise. If you think your audience won’t know what you’re talking about, provide a VERY VERY brief recap of the event or story before launching into your own views on the topic.
Audience and Purpose:
Remember that the purpose of a letter to the editor, as a civic genre, is not just to SAY something (to express your opinion) but to DO something—to move your audience toward a new way of thinking or acting. So your letter really needs to speak to the audience directly and ask for a change in belief or action. I saw a lot of opinion in your letters (appropriately) but sometimes it was hard to see what you wanted me, as a reader, to DO about that opinion.
Two good ways to fix this problem:
1) Address your letter directly to the people you imagine will be reading it. Ask them--directly--for a change in belief or action.
OR
2) Set up your letter as a kind of “open letter” to whatever person (usually someone with power or prominence) you think has the power to change the situation you are concerned about. Tell THAT person what you think they need to do or pay attention to.
Focus:
Once you’ve clarified for yourself what you want to accomplish with your letter, keep your focus on JUST THAT point. Don’t ramble, don’t bite off more than you can chew, don’t just write to enjoy the sound of your own voice, (A good letter to the editor can really only make ONE STRONG POINT. Obama's entire administration is probably too much to take on, for example, in a single letter.)
Appealing to your audience:
Did you ever hear the advice “Show, don’t tell”? I wrote that advice in the margins of many of your papers. You’re not going to move your audience just by calling something “ridiculous” or “shameful.” A better way to go at it is to present your case so well that the audience decides for themselves that something is “shameful” or “ridiculous”
The fact that you hold an opinion isn’t going to change any minds, all by itself. You need to appeal to your audience, in at least one of the three ways you learned about in English 101/102: by making them trust you as an authority (credibility or “ethos”), by presenting reasons or evidence that they hadn’t considered before (“logos”) or by moving them emotionally.
Tone:
Lots of your letters had a strong tone—humorous or sarcastic or angry. That’s okay if you are ethical about it (no name-calling, no insults to individuals or groups). A strong tone will definitely entertain and may actually move your audience. But be careful how you target your anger or sarcasm. If your audience feels that they themselves are the target of your sarcasm or anger, it may misfire.
Last but not least, STYLE:
Make every word count. Lots of your letters had the kind of fillers and wheel-spinning that is typical of school writing –overusing adverbs and adjectives like “really”, “truly”, padding your writing with phrases like “in this world we live in today..” or stating the obvious as in “My name is …. and I’d like to share my opinion on…”) You don’t have space for that!
As you are revising your letters, I urge you to apply the lessons from our last “style” quiz. One way to make every word count is to follow those principles: Make your subjects characters and your verbs actions.
And PROOFREAD: Avoid the kinds of errors—misspelled names, misused words, sloppy punctuation, unintentional fragments and run-on sentences—that can undermine your credibility.
Colton,Zach, Matt, and Paul were in the class room from 1:25-2:00. We discussed the e-mail you sent out and went through the sections one at a time and worked on each person's paper individually.
ReplyDeleteWe read through the assignment sheet and talked about how to self edit the papers at home. For the later part of our meeting we talked about how to write the analysis and how we plan on going about it.
As a group we went over your suggestions in our workshop. We also discussed such issues as organization, clarity, and conciseness of our letters. There were also a few grammatical errors we found and corrected
ReplyDelete-Luke Wylie
Justin Wallen
Ben Knisley
Amanda Lowrey
Chris Hickey
Mrs. Knox,
ReplyDeleteI was going to tell you that Me, Both Adams, Marcia, Dorian met and exchanged feedback about our letters to the editor. We were discussing the idea as a class (since every group met in the room), that it would be extremely beneficial if there were some way that we could see your comments on our rough drafts on Monday, and turn in our letters on Wednesday. That way we could correct any major problems that we might have before turning it in. We are all somewhat confused about whether we are being concise enough, or even if we are not being broad enough. We appreciate the e-mail and it helped somewhat, but the personal comments would be even a bigger help. We would really appreciate the feedback that you could give us, to help us out. Thank You!
Nathan Horn
Olivia, Bruce, Mason, Kyle, and Hunter were all in attendance on Friday. We all met at the same time in our usual room. We utilized the strengths of each individual in our group and encompassed them when revising our letters. Without this revision we would have inadequate information on how to write a letter. But we still feel a little lost. We feel that considering you are going to be the actual grader, and we want to do as well as possible, we were wondering if there was any way we could get your feedback via the rough drafts. thanks.
ReplyDeleteGot this question from one group: "We were wondering if we need to have any kind of sources in our letter? And what we should do if we want to include quotes."
ReplyDeleteIn public genre, people don't use formal citations, of course, but it is good to let your readers know --informally--if you've consulted a credible source, because it enhances your own credibility.
For the purposes of our assignment, you should include a list of any sources you referred to in your analysis, in standard academic style.